[quote=katerina68 post_id=6028 time=1657554811 user_id=171] For the parent/child coincidence of 50% for each of the parent. [/quote] 50 it are a lot of. For me this taboo. Surely condom or tablets.
[quote=katerina68 post_id=6028 time=1657554811 user_id=171] For the parent/child coincidence of 50% for each of the parent. [/quote] 50 it are a lot of. For me this taboo. Surely condom or tablets.
The risk of congenital defects from an incest is strongly exaggerated, mother who smokes during pregnancy has more chances of The biggest risk in an incest carries social, but not genetic character, people with the prejudices don't wish to see or accept a way of life which doesn't belong to them.
The risk of congenital defects from an incest is strongly exaggerated, mother who smokes during pregnancy has more chances of The biggest risk in an incest carries social, but not genetic character, people with the prejudices don't wish to see or accept a way of life which doesn't belong to them.
[quote=darkholme0 post_id=6376 time=1658124677 user_id=1372] The risk of congenital defects from an incest is strongly exaggerated, mother who smokes during pregnancy has more chances of The biggest risk in an incest carries social, but not genetic character, people with the prejudices don't wish to see or accept a way of life which doesn't belong to them. [/quote]
For you risk of genetic disorders for the brother and the sister in 25% and for nephews/nieces and aunts/uncles 12%
[quote=darkholme0 post_id=6376 time=1658124677 user_id=1372] The risk of congenital defects from an incest is strongly exaggerated, mother who smokes during pregnancy has more chances of The biggest risk in an incest carries social, but not genetic character, people with the prejudices don't wish to see or accept a way of life which doesn't belong to them. [/quote]
For you risk of genetic disorders for the brother and the sister in 25% and for nephews/nieces and aunts/uncles 12% These are insignificant risks?
You misunderstand figures, these are not 25% chance, these are 25% increase in chance. If the probability of normal development of a disease is 1%, then the incest will make her for 25% of more probable, that is with a probability of 1.25%.
The increased risk is incredibly small, and there are many other factors increasing risk which society doesn't condemn.
You misunderstand figures, these are not 25% chance, these are 25% increase in chance. If the probability of normal development of a disease is 1%, then the incest will make her for 25% of more probable, that is with a probability of 1.25%. The increased risk is incredibly small, and there are many other factors increasing risk which society doesn't condemn.
[quote=darkholme0 post_id=6380 time=1658127673 user_id=1372] You misunderstand figures, these are not 25% chance, these are 25% increase in chance. If the probability of normal development of a disease is 1%, then the incest will make her for 25% of more probable, that is with a probability of 1.25%.
The increased risk is incredibly small, and there are many other factors increasing risk which society doesn't condemn. [/quote]
A little you finish thinking about the text of articles. In them there are no lines that this increase pays off concerning norm. Percent is defined as the probability of the event. Otherwise it would be specified.
And about 1% of usual marriages too not right information, is about 2-3% for today.
[quote=darkholme0 post_id=6380 time=1658127673 user_id=1372] You misunderstand figures, these are not 25% chance, these are 25% increase in chance. If the probability of normal development of a disease is 1%, then the incest will make her for 25% of more probable, that is with a probability of 1.25%. The increased risk is incredibly small, and there are many other factors increasing risk which society doesn't condemn. [/quote]
A little you finish thinking about the text of articles. In them there are no lines that this increase pays off concerning norm. Percent is defined as the probability of the event. Otherwise it would be specified.
And about 1% of usual marriages too not right information, is about 2-3% for today.
Not, children to give birth from relatives very bad idea. VERY MUCH! It can aunnutsya not in the first, so the second or third generation. To fuck - please.
[quote=Logos post_id=6383 time=1658133980 user_id=1317] Not, children to give birth from relatives very bad idea. VERY MUCH!
It can aunnutsya not in the first, so the second or third To fuck - please. [/quote]
Don't take everything in all good faith. Here the whole heap writes the people And that give birth from the immediate direct blood family even to 6 children and nothing.
And what at minor age means this childbirth or an ugolovka for someone or children without uniform document and too elementary common sense of their
Probably people want to write something pozaboristy, but to present as it in reality for them would be already complicated.
[quote=Logos post_id=6383 time=1658133980 user_id=1317] Not, children to give birth from relatives very bad idea. VERY MUCH! It can aunnutsya not in the first, so the second or third To fuck - please. [/quote]
Don't take everything in all good faith. Here the whole heap writes the people And that give birth from the immediate direct blood family even to 6 children and nothing. And what at minor age means this childbirth or an ugolovka for someone or children without uniform document and too elementary common sense of their
Probably people want to write something pozaboristy, but to present as it in reality for them would be already complicated.
[quote=Logos post_id=6388 time=1658136410 user_id=1317] If mother gave rise from the son, I don't see problems with legalization of the child. [/quote] And the minor daughter from the father?
I that am more about it when nesovershennoletka allegedly give birth.
[quote=Logos post_id=6388 time=1658136410 user_id=1317] If mother gave rise from the son, I don't see problems with legalization of the child. [/quote] And the minor daughter from the father? I that am more about it when nesovershennoletka allegedly give birth.
[quote=katerina68 post_id=6389 time=1658136446 user_id=171] [quote=Logos post_id=6388 time=1658136410 user_id=1317] If mother gave rise from the son, I don't see problems with legalization of the child. [/quote] And the minor daughter from the father? [/quote] If 16 that is her nobody has to ask from someone the child
If isn't present 16 then yes bodies will begin to understand in principle
[quote=katerina68 post_id=6389 time=1658136446 user_id=171] [quote=Logos post_id=6388 time=1658136410 user_id=1317] If mother gave rise from the son, I don't see problems with legalization of the child. [/quote] And the minor daughter from the father? [/quote] If 16 that is her nobody has to ask from someone the child If isn't present 16 then yes bodies will begin to understand in principle
[quote=Logos post_id=6037 time=1657556441 user_id=1317] [quote=katerina68 post_id=6028 time=1657554811 user_id=171] For the parent/child coincidence of 50% for each of the parent. [/quote] 50 it are a lot of. For me this taboo. Surely condom or tablets. [/quote]
Well at you the conversation three together with the wife and the son took place?
[quote=Logos post_id=6037 time=1657556441 user_id=1317] [quote=katerina68 post_id=6028 time=1657554811 user_id=171] For the parent/child coincidence of 50% for each of the parent. [/quote] 50 it are a lot of. For me this taboo. Surely condom or tablets. [/quote]
Well at you the conversation three together with the wife and the son took place?
[quote=robert21 post_id=6401 time=1658142390 user_id=545] Well at you the conversation three together with the wife and the son took place? To answer Previous темаСлед. subject 63 messages Previous 1 2 Prompt reply, comment, response [/quote] So far not, but the wife herself provokes the son to frankness. The son doesn't make contact yet.
[quote=piter88 post_id=5541 time=1657038662 user_id=1245] Won't you prompt the name of a game? It became interesting. [/quote] I googled here, and if it is interesting to someone, then a game is called Crusader Kings 2 and Crusader Kings 3. There is a possibility of related marriages with the following consequences for health of descendants. But there only the text, there are no pictures, and it is not a pornographic game, but just political strategy.
[quote=piter88 post_id=5541 time=1657038662 user_id=1245] Won't you prompt the name of a game? It became interesting. [/quote] I googled here, and if it is interesting to someone, then a game is called Crusader Kings 2 and Crusader Kings 3. There is a possibility of related marriages with the following consequences for health of descendants. But there only the text, there are no pictures, and it is not a pornographic game, but just political strategy.